Kim v. Hakuya Sushi, Inc

Court

District Court, N.D. Illinois (N.D. Ill.)
Official Court Website →

Assigned judge

Sheila M. Finnegan · 383 cases in index

Docket number

1:15-cv-03747

Cause

15:2(a) Fair Labor Standards Act
15 U.S.C. § 2 — Sherman Act (monopolization)

Nature of suit

710 Labor: Fair Standards
Unpaid-wage and overtime claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Jurisdiction

Federal Question

Jury demand

Plaintiff

Date filed

04/29/2015

Date terminated

12/18/2017

42,137 Labor cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

• plaintiff · Kim · 1226 cases
• defendant · Hakuya Sushi, Inc

Part of a Larger Litigation Pattern

This is one of 2 Labor cases in our index naming Hakuya Sushi, INC — a possible mass-tort or coordinated-litigation cluster.

About Labor Lawsuits

Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Kim v. Hakuya Sushi, Inc?

Kim v. Hakuya Sushi, Inc is a federal labor lawsuit filed on 04/29/2015 in the District Court, N.D. Illinois. The case was terminated on 12/18/2017. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Labor” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, N.D. Illinois, docket number 1:15-cv-03747.

When was the case filed?

Kim v. Hakuya Sushi, Inc was filed on 04/29/2015. It was terminated on 12/18/2017.

What law is the case brought under?

The docket lists the cause as 15 U.S.C. § 2 — Sherman Act (monopolization).