Mintz v. Murphy, Et Al
Mintz v. Murphy, Et Al is a federal labor lawsuit filed on 06/27/1994 in the District Court, M.D. Florida. The case was terminated on 02/29/1996.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, M.D. Florida (M.D. Fla.)
Official Court Website → - Docket number
- —
- Nature of suit
- 791 Employee Retirement Income Security Act
Disputes over employee benefit and pension plans under ERISA. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 06/27/1994
- Date terminated
- 02/29/1996
22,529 Labor cases in this court are indexed here.
About Labor Lawsuits
Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Mintz v. Murphy, Et Al?
Mintz v. Murphy, Et Al is a federal labor lawsuit filed on 06/27/1994 in the District Court, M.D. Florida. The case was terminated on 02/29/1996. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Labor” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, M.D. Florida.
When was the case filed?
Mintz v. Murphy, Et Al was filed on 06/27/1994. It was terminated on 02/29/1996.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Labor Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 62742143 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket). Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).