Pond & Spitz v. Kay
Pond & Spitz v. Kay is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 08/02/1996 in the District Court, D. New Jersey. The case was terminated on 05/12/1997.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. New Jersey (D.N.J.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Stephen M. Orlofsky · 1,325 cases in index
- Docket number
- 1:96-cv-03862
- Nature of suit
- 820 Copyright
Infringement of copyrighted works. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 08/02/1996
- Date terminated
- 05/12/1997
3,390 Copyright cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Pond & Spitz
- defendant · Kay · 372 cases
About Copyright Lawsuits
Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Pond & Spitz v. Kay?
Pond & Spitz v. Kay is a federal copyright lawsuit filed on 08/02/1996 in the District Court, D. New Jersey. The case was terminated on 05/12/1997. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Copyright” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Copyright lawsuits allege unauthorized use, copying, or distribution of creative works protected under the Copyright Act — including software, music, film, writing, and images.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. New Jersey, docket number 1:96-cv-03862.
When was the case filed?
Pond & Spitz v. Kay was filed on 08/02/1996. It was terminated on 05/12/1997.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Copyright Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 10323768 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 1:96-cv-03862 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).