Root River Auto Body v. Ppg Industries, Inc

Court

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania (E.D. Pa.)
Official Court Website →

Assigned judge

R. Barclay Surrick · 2,457 cases in index

Docket number

2:02-cv-00284

Nature of suit

410 Antitrust
Claims of unlawful restraint of trade, monopolization, or anticompetitive conduct under the Sherman and Clayton Acts.

Jurisdiction

Federal question

Date filed

01/17/2002

Date terminated

09/16/2009

1,619 Antitrust cases in this court are indexed here.

Parties

• plaintiff · Root River Auto Body · 2 cases
• defendant · Ppg Industries, Inc Industrial Chemicals & Materials · 493 cases

Part of a Larger Litigation Pattern

This is one of 494 Antitrust cases in our index naming PPG Industries, Inc — a possible mass-tort or coordinated-litigation cluster.

• Baird v. Ppg Industries Inc
  District Court, N.D. AlabamaFiled 12/09/2016
• Bailes Granite & Marble v. Ppg Industries, Inc
  District Court, W.D. PennsylvaniaFiled 02/25/2008
• Atlantic Auto Collision, Inc v. Ppg Industries, Inc
  District Court, E.D. PennsylvaniaFiled 06/26/2006
• Atlantic Collision, Inc v. Ppg Industries, Inc
  District Court, E.D. New YorkFiled 03/21/2005
• Ct Color and Supply, Inc v. Ppg Industries
  District Court, E.D. PennsylvaniaFiled 06/03/2002
• Desha v. Ppg Industries
  District Court, E.D. PennsylvaniaFiled 05/28/2002

About Antitrust Lawsuits

Antitrust lawsuits allege unlawful restraints on competition — price-fixing, monopolization, market allocation, or anticompetitive mergers — brought under federal antitrust statutes such as the Sherman and Clayton Acts.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Root River Auto Body v. Ppg Industries, Inc?

Root River Auto Body v. Ppg Industries, Inc is a federal antitrust lawsuit filed on 01/17/2002 in the District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. The case was terminated on 09/16/2009. Antitrust lawsuits allege unlawful restraints on competition — price-fixing, monopolization, market allocation, or anticompetitive mergers — brought under federal antitrust statutes such as the Sherman and Clayton Acts.

What type of case is this?

It is classified as “Antitrust” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Antitrust lawsuits allege unlawful restraints on competition — price-fixing, monopolization, market allocation, or anticompetitive mergers — brought under federal antitrust statutes such as the Sherman and Clayton Acts.

What court is the case in?

The case is in the District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania, docket number 2:02-cv-00284.

When was the case filed?

Root River Auto Body v. Ppg Industries, Inc was filed on 01/17/2002. It was terminated on 09/16/2009.