Son v. Kim
Son v. Kim is a federal labor lawsuit filed on 04/29/2015 in the District Court, N.D. Illinois. The case was terminated on 07/07/2016.
- Court
- District Court, N.D. Illinois (N.D. Ill.)
Official Court Website → - Assigned judge
- Harry D. Leinenweber · 6,527 cases in index
- Docket number
- 1:15-cv-03758
- Cause
- 15:2(a) Fair Labor Standards Act
15 U.S.C. § 2 — Sherman Act (monopolization) - Nature of suit
- 710 Labor: Fair Standards
Unpaid-wage and overtime claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act. - Jurisdiction
- Federal Question
- Jury demand
- Both
- Date filed
- 04/29/2015
- Date terminated
- 07/07/2016
42,138 Labor cases in this court are indexed here.
About Labor Lawsuits
Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Son v. Kim?
Son v. Kim is a federal labor lawsuit filed on 04/29/2015 in the District Court, N.D. Illinois. The case was terminated on 07/07/2016. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Labor” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, N.D. Illinois, docket number 1:15-cv-03758.
When was the case filed?
Son v. Kim was filed on 04/29/2015. It was terminated on 07/07/2016.
What law is the case brought under?
The docket lists the cause as 15 U.S.C. § 2 — Sherman Act (monopolization).
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Labor Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record (docket 5634397).