Wall v. Gibson Etal
Wall v. Gibson Etal is a federal labor lawsuit filed on 03/21/1986 in the District Court, W.D. Virginia. The case was terminated on 09/21/1988.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, W.D. Virginia (W.D. Va.)
Official Court Website → - Docket number
- —
- Nature of suit
- 710 Fair Labor Standards Act
Unpaid-wage and overtime claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act. - Jurisdiction
- Federal question
- Date filed
- 03/21/1986
- Date terminated
- 09/21/1988
1,736 Labor cases in this court are indexed here.
About Labor Lawsuits
Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Wall v. Gibson Etal?
Wall v. Gibson Etal is a federal labor lawsuit filed on 03/21/1986 in the District Court, W.D. Virginia. The case was terminated on 09/21/1988. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Labor” under the federal nature-of-suit system. Labor lawsuits involve the employment relationship — unpaid wages and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act, union and collective-bargaining disputes, employee benefits under ERISA, and family and medical leave claims.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, W.D. Virginia.
When was the case filed?
Wall v. Gibson Etal was filed on 03/21/1986. It was terminated on 09/21/1988.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Labor Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 8579617 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket). Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).