Labr v. Sealy, Inc
Labr v. Sealy, Inc is a federal other civil lawsuit filed on 06/15/1999 in the District Court, D. Colorado. The case is currently open in the federal court system.
A lawsuit records allegations and procedural activity. Being named as a party does not establish liability, wrongdoing, or the merits of any claim.
- Court
- District Court, D. Colorado (D. Colo.)
Official Court Website → - Docket number
- 1:99-mc-00025
- Cause
- Civil Miscellaneous Case
- Nature of suit
- 999 Invalid
These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category. - Jurisdiction
- Federal Question
- Jury demand
- None
- Date filed
- 06/15/1999
2,445 Other Civil cases in this court are indexed here.
Parties
- plaintiff · Labr · 627 cases
- defendant · Sealy, Inc · 26 cases
Other Cases Naming This Defendant
Sealy, Inc is named in 26 federal civil cases in this index. Recent Other Civil cases naming the same defendant:
About Other Civil Lawsuits
These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Labr v. Sealy, Inc?
Labr v. Sealy, Inc is a federal other civil lawsuit filed on 06/15/1999 in the District Court, D. Colorado. The case is currently open in the federal court system. These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
What type of case is this?
It is classified as “Other Civil” under the federal nature-of-suit system. These are federal civil cases that do not fall under a more specific nature-of-suit category.
What court is the case in?
The case is in the District Court, D. Colorado, docket number 1:99-mc-00025.
When was the case filed?
Labr v. Sealy, Inc was filed on 06/15/1999. The case is currently open.
Other Cases Involving These Parties
Related Other Civil Cases
Source: public U.S. federal court record — docket 30132680 in the CourtListener/RECAP archive (verify this docket), court docket number 1:99-mc-00025 on PACER. Court, party, date and judge fields are reproduced from that record; case-type categories, statute decoding and all aggregate figures are derived by Docket Nexus (methodology).